Steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials: suitable brain signals for brain-computer interfaces?
By Gernot R. Müller-Putz, Reinhold Scherer, Christa Neuper, Gert Pfurtscheller. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering, 2006
297 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82f8194419e2a5b7195789f8b6e9954f40ba8f81
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Brendan Z. Allison
- Christa Neuper
- Gert Pfurtscheller
- Benjamin Blankertz
- Bernhard Graimann
- Andrea Kübler
- Michael W. Tangermann
- Ganesh R. Naik
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Benjamin Blankertz
- Brendan Z. Allison
- Christa Neuper
- Gert Pfurtscheller
- Andrea Kübler
- Fabien Lotte
- Michael W. Tangermann
- Bernhard Graimann
Citations in the corpus
- Could Anyone Use a BCI? (2010, background): “While most BCIs rely on visual stimuli, BCIs have also been developed based on auditory (Kubler et al. 2009) and tactile ( Muller-Putz et al. 2006 ) stimuli.”
- Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Gentle Introduction (2009, background): “The stimuli can be auditory [13] or somatosensory [14].”
- A New Auditory Multi-Class Brain-Computer Interface Paradigm: Spatial Hearing as an Informative Cue (2010, background): “Therefore, other modalities are now being explored such as audition [2–10] and touch [11–14] in order to make BCI independent of vision.”
- A comprehensive review of EEG-based brain–computer interface paradigms (2019, unknown): “Muller-Putz et al [124] investigated the usability of the steady-state somatosensory evoked potential paradigm.”
- Brain computer interfacing: Applications and challenges (2015, unknown): “The stimulation could be either visual as in Steady State Visually Evoked Potentials (SSVEP) [128], auditory as in steady-state auditory evoked potentials (SSAEP) [129] or even somatosensory as in Steady-state somatosensory evoked potential (SSSEP) [130].”
- Progress in Brain Computer Interface: Challenges and Opportunities (2019, background): “…[61], steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) [62], auditory evoked potential (AEP) [63], steady-state somatosensory evoked potential (SSSEP) [64] and motor imagery (MI) [14], have been proposed to detect cognitive signatures although none of the signatures performs well for all BCI…”
- A Brain–Computer Interface Controlled Auditory Event‐Related Potential (P300) Spelling System for Locked‐In Patients (2009, background): “19 In each trial, both index fingers were stimulated simultaneously at different frequencies, and participants were instructed by arrows on a computer screen to which finger they should pay attention.”