Love and loathing of the city: Urbanophilia and urbanophobia, topological identity and perceived incivilities

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviours: A structural equation modelling approach (2013, background): “While it is widely acknowledged in the environmental psychology and leisure/recreation literature that places are grounded in environmental and social experiences (Felonneau, 2004; Moore & Graefe, 1994), they also note an affective link that individuals develop (Rolero & De Picolli, 2010) by buildin”
Processes of Place Identification and Residential Satisfaction (2008, background): “Moreover, Félonneau (2004) shows that students who have a high level of identification tend to underestimate the frequency of the incivilities they encounter on a daily basis and, conversely, weakly identified students overestimate those same incivilities.”
Place attachment, identification and environment perception: An empirical study (2010, background): “As Félonneau (2004) argues, while representations of the place are grounded in social experiences and acquire different values, they also constitute a deep expression of the subjectivity of the person.”
Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? (2011, unknown): “Individual differences also play a role in preferences either for urban and thus more heterogeneous places or for traditional rural communities, the phenomenon which has been called urbanophilia vs. urbanophobia by Félonneau (2004).”