Financial Performance of Socially Responsible Investing (SRI): What Have We Learned? A Meta‐Analysis

478 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance (2017, unknown): “Overall, there appears to be a consensus in the literature, supported by meta-analyses (Friede et al., 2015; Revelli and Viviani, 2015), that at CSP-screened portfolios neither outperform not underperform conventional portfolios with similar characteristics on a consistent basis.”
Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study (2018, unknown): “…the themes emerging from reviews of the mainstream CSR literature (e.g. operational efficiencies, financial performance, firm reputation, firm capabilities, market outcomes, wealth maximization and agency problems (Aguinis and Glavas 2012; Coulmont and Berthelot 2015; Revelli and Viviani 2015).”
Past, present, and future of sustainable finance: insights from big data analytics through machine learning of scholarly research (2022, unknown): “…impact investing (Clarkin & Cangioni, 2016), and socially responsible investing (Camilleri, 2020; Fabregat-Aibar et al., 2019; Rahman, et al., 2020; Revelli & Viviani, 2015; Viviers & Eccles, 2012), and using bibliometric analysis, researchers such as Bui et al. (2020) have revealed insights on…”