Quantifying the costs and benefits of parental care in female treehoppers
By Andrew G. Zink. 2003
85 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82ab7ca0189a6265e8f453102d8c0b753dbe4c6d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
In Insect Science
Citations in the corpus
- Patterns of parental care in invertebrates (2012, background): “Zink, A. G. (2003). Quantifying the costs and benefits of”
- Infanticide, sexual selection and task specialization in a biparental burying beetle (2006, background): “Because parental investment reduces future reproduction (Trivers 1972; Zink 2003), there is the temptation to be the first to desert, saving the costs of parental effort.”
- Benefits and costs of earwig (Forficula auricularia) family life (2007, background): “Such conditions may include harsh and unpredictable ecological environments due to the obvious benefits of care to offspring survival (Wilson 1971, 1975; Tallamy 1984; Tallamy and Wood 1986; Clutton-Brock 1991).”
- Theoretical foundations of parental care (2012, background): “2010) and future maternal reproductive success in the treehopper Publilia concava (Zink 2003).”
- The evolution of parental care in insects: the roles of ecology, life history and the social environment (2013, background): “Thus, tending and non-tending females had roughly similar fitness, which could explain why the two alternative reproductive tactics are maintained in treehopper populations (Zink, 2003a).”