Poverty or preference: what do ‘consensual deprivation indicators’ really mean?

By S. McKay. 2005

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82ab3427df8fb9be0338f5b286a596bd24ca0bf4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. B. Nolan
2. C. Whelan
3. Björn Halleröd

In Social Psychology

1. C. Whelan
2. B. Nolan
3. Björn Halleröd
4. B. Perry

In Sociology and Political Science

1. C. Whelan
2. B. Nolan
3. Björn Halleröd
4. B. Maître
5. Sergio Tirado Herrero
6. B. Perry
7. Kenneth Nelson
8. Anne-Catherine Guio

Citations in the corpus

• Sour Grapes: Relative Deprivation, Adaptive Preferences and the Measurement of Poverty (2006, background): “The reliance on people’s ability to identify socially agreed necessities, often, but not always (cf. Berthoud et al., 2004; Halleröd et al., forthcoming), a central feature of many O-Rdindex, has been criticised by McKay (2004).”
• Using Non-Monetary Deprivation Indicators to Analyze Poverty and Social Exclusion: Lessons from Europe?. (2010, background): “However, some persistently low income households may also not be reporting their actual deprivation levels accurately, having become habituated to doing without, or having different expectations from the majority (Halleröd, 2006; McKay, 2004; Dominy and Kempson, 2006).”