Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence

By B. Copeland, M. Taylor. 2003

411 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/829fa563d1c5136be2b8613eec68d5bda1825a6f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Energy intensity and foreign direct investment: A Chinese city-level study (2013, background): “Such a distinction is made by Antweiler et al. (2001), Cole and Elliott (2003) and Copeland and Taylor (2003) looking at environmental pollutants and Cole (2006) and Hübler and Keller (2009) who apply the same criteria to energy consumption.”
Foreign direct Investment–CO2 emissions nexus in Middle East and North African countries: Importance of biomass energy consumption (2019, background): “When a country’s cost of legal enforcement of pollution regulations is less than other production costs, that country can gain a competitive edge (Copeland and Taylor, 2003).”
Trade, pollution and mortality in China (2016, positive): “Employing the language introduced by Grossman and Krueger (1995), Copeland and Taylor (2003) and Copeland and Taylor (2004), increased international trade can: i) lead to a more intense scale of production which increases pollution (scale effect) ; ii) induce specialization, which could reduce or…”
An Empirical Examination of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis for India: Towards a Green Leontief Paradox? (2007, background): “This hypothesis maintains that pollution intensities of production are highly correlated with capital intensities (see e.g. Copeland and Taylor, 2003).”
Does Globalisation Worsen Environmental Quality in Developed Economies? (2018, background): “Copeland and Taylor (2003, 2004), through their pollution haven hypothesis, also support international trade as highly beneficial to environmental quality through the enforcement of strong environmental regulations.”
Unbundling the Pollution Haven Hypothesis (2005, methodology): “See CT (1994) section VIII and chapter 6 of Copeland and Taylor (2003).”
Carbon Tariffs: An Analysis of the Trade, Welfare and Emission Effects (2017, positive): “We refer to a sector as dirty or clean if it is carbon-emission intensive in production or not, respectively, following Copeland and Taylor (2003). For a list of the industries and their grouping to the two sectors see Appendix B.”
A simultaneous estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from China (2006, background): “1 See, for example, Grossman and Krueger (1995), Selden and Song (1994), Shafik and Bandyopadhyay (1992), Hilton and Levinson (1998), etc.”
Are RTA agreements with environmental provisions reducing emissions (2013, positive): “After two decades of research, it is commonly accepted that the effects of trade liberalization on the environment are complex and can be classified into scale, composition and technique effects and that there may also be interaction between these effects (Copeland and Taylor, 2003).”
Trade, Growth and the Environment (2004, background): “For modeling purposes, we need to be specific about the trade barriers that are being reduced.”