Niche dynamics in space and time.
By P. Pearman, Antoine Guisan, O. Broennimann, C. Randin. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2008
1,000 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/829ab1b04a920f91271bc6e5b633f25e038ecab7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- A. Townsend Peterson
- Antoine Guisan
- Miguel B. Araújo
- Wilfried Thuiller
- Jane Elith
- Jorge Soberón
- Jorge M. Lobo
- Joaquín Hortal
In Genetics
- A. Townsend Peterson
- Jorge Soberón
- Jane Elith
- Miguel B. Araújo
- Catherine H. Graham
- Wilfried Thuiller
- R. P. Anderson
- Antoine Guisan
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Wilfried Thuiller
- Antoine Guisan
- Miguel B. Araújo
- A. Townsend Peterson
- Jane Elith
- Jorge Soberón
- Jorge M. Lobo
- Joaquín Hortal
Citations in the corpus
- Joint dynamic species distribution models: a tool for community ordination and spatio‐temporal monitoring (2016, background): “However, the relationship between abiotic habitat and species distribution may vary over time due to species invasions, climate shifts and many other factors (Pearman et al ., 2008).”
- Ditch the niche – is the niche a useful concept in ecology or species distribution modelling? (2012, background): “There are environments and habitats that are niches (see glossary in Pearman et al., 2008), and niches that are found in habitats and environments (Austin, 1985).”
- Invasion of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and the rise of the boreal ecosystem in Fennoscandia (2009, background): “A positive answer would suggest a significantly smaller, competitionlimited realized environmental niche than the potential niche (Pearman et al. 2007) for T. cordata during the mid-Holocene and would invalidate an important assumption of species distribution models that relate species…”
- Modeling Species and Community Responses to Past, Present, and Future Episodes of Climatic and Ecological Change (2015, methodology): “In addition to using molecular data to validate ENMs through time (e.g., Waltari et al. 2007, Acevedo et al. 2012), fossil species occurrence data provide another means to independently validate ENMs (e.g., Martinéz Meyer et al. 2004, Pearman et al. 2008b, McGuire & Davis 2013, Yannic et al. 2014) ”
- Novel seasonal land cover associations for eastern North American forest birds identified through dynamic species distribution modelling (2016, background): “, 2008), but many of these approaches assume that these environmental relationships do not change over space and time (Pearman et al., 2008).”
- Small mammal responses to environmental change: integrating past and present dynamics (2014, background): “Future forecasts for how species are likely to respond to environmental change routinely focus on how species distributions may shift under the direct impacts of climate change (Pearman et al. 2008; Elith and Leathwick 2009).”
- Bringing the Hutchinsonian niche into the 21st century: Ecological and evolutionary perspectives (2009, background): “Yet there can be intraspecific genetic variation in the niche, fueling rapid niche evolution (58) both within species and across clades.”
- Assessing the environmental requirements of invaders using ensembles of distribution models (2011, background): “Under this prospect, an invader can occupy different conditions from those previously recorded and NBM predictions can fail to predict these shifts (Pearman et al., 2008).”
- Climatic niche at physiological and macroecological scales: the thermal tolerance–geographical range interface and niche dimensionality (2014, background): “Permeating the niche–space transferability is the fact that the environment changes across space and time, altering the geography of species, and sometimes forcing them to modify their Hutchinsonian niches (Pearman et al., 2008; Colwell & Rangel, 2009).”