Interactions of visual stimuli in the receptive fields of inferior temporal neurons in awake macaques

By T. Sato. 2004

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Lifelong learning of human actions with deep neural network self-organization (2017, positive): “Mechanisms of MAX-pooling in hierarchical models are also compatible with neurophysiological data (Riesenhuber & Poggio, 1999), e.g. showing that the response of neurons in the inferotemporal (IT) cortex is dominated by the stimulus producing the highest firing rate (Sato, 1989).”
Modeling Cross-Modal Enhancement and Modality-Specific Suppression in Multisensory Neurons (2003, background): “Modality-speci c suppressive interactions have also been reported for neurons in a number of primate cortical visual structures (Sato, 1989, 1995; Reynolds, Chelazzi, & Desimone, 1999).”
Trade-Off between Object Selectivity and Tolerance in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex (2007, background): “…al., 2007), most of these studies found that some fraction of neurons were much more tolerant to clutter (Chelazzi et al., 1998; Reynolds et al., 1999; Zoccolan et al., 2005), sometimes a large fraction (Sato, 1989; Sheinberg and Logothetis, 2001) or a majority (Gawne and Martin, 2002) of neurons.”
Invariant Visual Object and Face Recognition: Neural and Computational Bases, and a Model, VisNet (2012, background): “What happens in a cluttered, natural, environment? Do all objects that can activate an inferior temporal neuron do so whenever they are anywhere within the large receptive fields of inferior temporal neurons (Sato, 1989; Rolls and Tovee, 1995a)? If so, the output of the visual system might be confus”
A quantitative theory of immediate visual recognition. (2007, unknown): “The existence of a MAX operation in visual cortex was proposed by Riesenhuber and Poggio (1999) from theoretical arguments [and limited experimental evidence (Sato, 1989)] and was later supported experimentally in both V4 (Gawne and Martin, 2002) and V1 at the complex cell level (Lampl et al.”
A Theory of Object Recognition: Computations and Circuits in the Feedforward Path of the Ventral Stream in Primate Visual Cortex (2005, background): “, scrambling [Vogels, 1999], presence of distractors within units receptive fields [Sato, 1989] and clutter [Missal et al.”
Multiple Object Response Normalization in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex (2005, background): “Consistent with previous investigators ( Sato , 1989 ; Miller et al .”
Generalization in vision and motor control (2004, background): “In addition, some neurons show specificity for a certain object view or lighting conditio”
Neurodynamics of biased competition and cooperation for attention: a model with spiking neurons. (2005, background): “…hypotheses in showing that attention serves to modulate the suppressive interaction between 2 or more stimuli within the receptive field (Chelazzi 1998; Chelazzi et al. 1993; Miller et al. 1993; Moran and Desimone 1985; Motter 1993, 1994; Reynolds and Desimone 1999; Sato 1989; Spitzer et al. 1988).”