Movement and vulnerability of bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in relation to FADs and natural aggregation points
By D. Itano, K. Holland. 2000
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/822adc4cec12bdd7ffa835ad1d6e48c4aca8d44a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Global and Planetary Change
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- Fish aggregation device (FAD) research: gaps in current knowledge and future directions for ecological studies (2004, background): “Minimum residence times at FADs have been determined for some fish species through direct observations (drifting FADs: Hunter and Mitchell, 1967), conventional tagging and recapture (drifting FADs: Takahashi et al., 1988; Hampton and Bailey, 1999, moored FADs: Itano and Holland, 2000) conventional t”
- Spatial management of Indian Ocean tropical tuna fisheries: potential and perspectives (2014, background): “Tuna residency times around FADs of the order of days to several weeks (Itano and Holland, 2000; Ohta and Kakuma, 2004) suggest that caution should be used when attempting to design dynamic MPAs to protect individuals around these and other habitat features.”
- Horizontal movements of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) near Hawaii determined by Kalman filter analysis of archival tagging data (2003, result): “This result supports the previous conclusion that bigeye tunas have a strong tendency to remain associated with offshore features such as weather buoys and sea mounts (Holland et al., 1999; Itano and Holland, 2000).”
- Behavior of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (T. obesus) tuna in a network of fish aggregating devices (FADs) (2007, background): “Previous conventional tagging conducted on the same array of FADs showed similarly high trends: 19.3% were recaptured (Itano and Holland 2000).”
- Bigeye Tuna (Thunnus obesus) behaviour and phisiology and their relevance to stock assessments and fishery biology (2005, background): “…behaviors are important for resource assessment issues as the behaviors of bigeye tuna around seamounts, and especially floating objects, make them significantly more vulnerable to a variety of fishing methods (Deriso et al. 1998, Itano and Holland 2000, Sibert et al. 2000, Holland et al. 2001).”
- Vulnerability of seamount fish to fishing: Fuzzy analysis of life-history attributes (2006, background): “This may be the case for some sharks (Klimley et al., 1988; Hazin et al., 1998), tunas (Holland et al., 1999; Itano and Holland, 2000; Sibert et al., 2000) and other large pelagic predators (Ward et al., 2000; Sedberry and Loefer, 2001).”
- Evidence of a seamount effect on aggregating visitors (2008, background): “…is known from fishers’ observations and from tagging studies that some seamounts host populations of bigeye tuna Thunnus obesus (Holland et al. 1999, Itano & Holland 2000, Sibert et al. 2000, 2003, Musyl et al. 2003), yellowfin tuna T. albacares (Holland et al. 1999, Itano & Holland 2000, Sibert…”
- Movements, behavior, and habitat utilization of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the northeastern Pacific Ocean, ascertained through archival tag data (2007, result): “Similar conclusions were reached from recent evaluations of yellowfin data for tagging with PDTs in the central Pacific (Itano and Holland 2000), and the western Pacific (Sibert and Hampton 2003).”