A pooled analysis of data comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents.

By C. Spaulding, J. Daemen, E. Boersma, D. Cutlip, Patrick W. Serruys. New England Journal of Medicine, 2007

749 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4eec073b9ec2c0c1ac69e5c62a380e180fd74f3a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

1. Rick A. Nishimura
2. C. Yancy

Citations in the corpus

• Coronary stents: current status. (2010, neutral): “(23) reported significantly higher mortality ith the use of SES compared with BMS at 4-years ollow-up (12.”
• ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiov (2007, methodology): “Spaulding et al (348) analyzed data from 1748 patients in 4 randomized trials of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents with regard to survival at 4 years.”