Real-time PCR reveals a high incidence of Symbiodinium clade D at low levels in four scleractinian corals across the Great Barrier Reef: implications for symbiont shuffling

By Jos C. Mieog, M. V. Oppen, Neal E. Cantin, W. Stam, Jeanine L. Olsen. Coral reefs, 2007

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Reef corals form associations with an array of genetically and physiologically distinct endosymbionts from the genus Symbiodinium. Some corals harbor different clades of symbionts simultaneously, and over time the relative abundances of these clades may change through a process called symbiont shuffling. It is hypothesized that this process provides a mechanism for corals to respond to environmental threats such as global warming. However, only a minority of coral species have been found to harbor more than one symbiont clade simultaneously and the current view is that the potential for symbiont shuffling is limited. Using a newly developed real-time PCR assay, this paper demonstrates that previous studies have underestimated the presence of background symbionts because of the low sensitivity of the techniques used. The assay used here targets the multi-copy rDNA ITS1 region and is able to detect Symbiodinium clades C and D with >100-fold higher sensitivity compared to conventional techniques. Technical considerations relating to intragenomic variation, estimating copy number and non-symbiotic contamination are discussed. Eighty-two colonies from four common scleractinian species (Acropora millepora, Acropora tenuis, Stylophora pistillata and Turbinaria reniformis) and 11 locations on the Great Barrier Reef were tested for background Symbiodinium clades. Although these colonies had been previously identified as harboring only a single clade based on SSCP analyses, background clades were detected in 78% of the samples, indicating that the potential for symbiont shuffling may be much larger than currently thought.

Subfields: Ecology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8211e9db784b0b3a88eb910bc3253a4cf5f585a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. A. Baker
  2. Xavier Pochon
  3. W. Fitt
  4. Gregory W. Schmidt
  5. Peter W. Glynn
  6. Dustin W. Kemp
  7. R. Berkelmans
  8. Bernhard Riegl

In Oceanography

  1. A. Baker
  2. Xavier Pochon
  3. W. Fitt
  4. Gregory W. Schmidt
  5. Dustin W. Kemp
  6. R. Berkelmans
  7. Peter W. Glynn
  8. Bernhard Riegl

Citations in the corpus