Comparing opportunistic and systematic sampling methods for non‐invasive genetic monitoring of a small translocated brown bear population

By M. Barba, L. Waits, P. Genovesi, E. Randi, R. Chirichella, Ermanno Cetto. 2010

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8205555298f414a845ca240f8e979ceb24c727a8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. E. Bellemain
2. Jon E. Swenson
3. P. Taberlet
4. D. Paetkau
5. L. Waits
6. O. Støen
7. J. Kindberg
8. A. Zedrosser

In Genetics

1. Jon E. Swenson
2. E. Bellemain
3. P. Taberlet
4. D. Paetkau
5. L. Waits
6. M. D. Schwartz
7. Andrew C. Clarke
8. Heidi M. Meudt

Citations in the corpus

• Estimating abundance of the remnant Apennine brown bear population using multiple noninvasive genetic data sources (2015, methodology): “However, using sampling methods that ensure sufficient sample coverage and high levels of capture probability increases the accuracy of abundance estimates (De Barba et al. 2010; Gervasi et al. 2010).”
• Genetics and conservation of European brown bears Ursus arctos (2011, background): “An experimental study of the small bear population in the Italian Alps (De Barba et al. 2010b) showed that the optimal sampling strategy combined systematic hair © 2011 The Authors.”