On the Possible Role of Brain Rhythms in Speech Perception: Intelligibility of Time-Compressed Speech with Periodic and Aperiodic Insertions of Silence
By Oded Ghitza, Steven Greenberg. Phonetica: International Journal of Phonetic Science, 2009
307 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81fff3ad7c162a5a43b848d93d6dfa38eda59bbc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Oded Ghitza
- Anne-Lise Giraud
- David Poeppel
- V. van Wassenhove
- Anne Kösem
- Gregory Hickok
- Luc H. Arnal
- Peter Indefrey
Citations in the corpus
- Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations (2012, background): “With respect to speech, psychophysical data 9 suggest integration over ~120 ms, which falls into the theta rhythm.”
- Linking Speech Perception and Neurophysiology: Speech Decoding Guided by Cascaded Oscillators Locked to the Input Rhythm (2011, methodology): “The present study is confined to the Ghitza and Greenberg (2009) data.”
- Distinct contributions of low- and high-frequency neural oscillations to speech comprehension (2017, background): “…stimulation (Ahissar et al., 2001; Nourski et al., 2009), and the impairment of speech recognition when the acoustic information is presented at too fast or too slow rates (Brungart & van Wassenhove, 2007; Brungart, Iyer, Simpson, & van Wassenhove, 2008; Ghitza, 2014; Ghitza & Greenberg, 2009).”
- The human auditory cortex concurrently tracks syllabic and phonemic timescales via acoustic spectral flux (2024, unknown): “Phonemes last typically between 30 and 150 ms in natural speech, with most being around 50 to 80 ms ( 1 , 40 ).”
- Back in time: Reversed speech as a window into cognitive language processing—A systematic review (2026, unknown): “Notably, the assumed neural mechanism associated with the syllable-analysis window (auditory theta-oscilla-tion at 3–8 Hz; Ghitza & Greenberg, 2009) has found to be coupled with a motor-related mechanism (motor theta-oscillation at 3–8 Hz; Assaneo & Poeppel, 2018).”