Network Polarization, Network Interdependence, and International Conflict, 1816–2002

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Network Analysis for International Relations (2009, background): “…transfer, it does not 68+ Corbetta 2007+ 69+ Ingram, Robinson, and Busch 2005+ 70+ Lewer and Van den Berg 2007+ 71+ Ward and Hoff 2007+ 72+ Maoz 2006+ 73+ Pevehouse, Nordstrom, and Warnke 2003+ necessarily lead to positive ties, as is often assumed in international relations+74 IGOs are…”
Inferential Network Analysis with Exponential Random Graph Models (2011, methodology): “…the interdependence of relationships for some time (i.e., Hoag 1960, Rosecrance and Stein 1973, Rosecrance et al. 1977, Keohane and Nye 1989, and Kroll 1993) and descriptive techniques for network data are now reasonably well known (i.e., Fowler 2006 and Maoz et al. 2006; Maoz 2006, 2009).”