Central Pressure More Strongly Relates to Vascular Disease and Outcome Than Does Brachial Pressure: The Strong Heart Study

By M. Roman, R. Devereux, J. Kizer, Elisa Lee, J. Galloway, T. Ali, J. Umans, B. Howard. HYPERTENSION, 2007

1,294 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Effects of a Short Forest Recreation Program on Physiological and Psychological Relaxation in Young Polish Adults (2019, background): “The lowering of SBP indicates the influence of the forest recreation intervention on autonomic nerve system activity [5,48], and thus it may be concluded that the tested intervention did have an influence on this system.”
Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with central haemodynamics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2010, methodology): “few studies report explicitly that outcomes were assessed in a blind manner.(9,14) The loss-events ratio ranged from 0(7,8,15) to 15%,(13) and it was less than 15% in all studies reporting number”
Central blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance. (2014, background): “In the larger Strong Heart Study, central pressure was more strongly related to future cardiovascular events than brachial pressure, in disease-free individuals.(4) Moreover, after mutual adjustment, brachial pressure ceased to be predictive.”