3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers.

By S. Waheed, Joan M. Cabot, Niall P. Macdonald, T. Lewis, R. Guijt, B. Paull, M. Breadmore. Lab on a Chip, 2016

808 citations recorded by the source corpus.

3D printing has the potential to significantly change the field of microfluidics. The ability to fabricate a complete microfluidic device in a single step from a computer model has obvious attractions, but it is the ability to create truly three dimensional structures that will provide new microfluidic capability that is challenging, if not impossible to make with existing approaches. This critical review covers the current state of 3D printing for microfluidics, focusing on the four most frequently used printing approaches: inkjet (i3DP), stereolithography (SLA), two photon polymerisation (2PP) and extrusion printing (focusing on fused deposition modeling). It discusses current achievements and limitations, and opportunities for advancement to reach 3D printing's full potential.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Biomedical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81c012fa5b345767e2c6e5de5e7e00370c3a301b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

  1. Yong Teng
  2. Caleb Jensen

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Yong Teng
  2. Caleb Jensen
  3. Ellen Cesewski
  4. Bruce K. Gale
  5. Blake N. Johnson

Citations in the corpus