Invasion of a stream food web by a new top predator

By G. Woodward, A. Hildrew. 2001

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81bd2c113c6ef309a5e2f9782392cfb2f538394b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. G. Woodward
2. U. Brose
3. A. Hildrew
4. C. Hassall
5. J. M. Schmid-Araya
6. M. Emmerson
7. Jens O. Riede
8. K. Layer

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. G. Woodward
2. U. Brose
3. M. Emmerson
4. Jens O. Riede
5. A. Hildrew
6. Björn C. Rall
7. K. Layer
8. J. M. Montoya

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. G. Woodward
2. A. Hildrew
3. J. M. Montoya
4. K. Layer
5. Jens O. Riede
6. J. M. Schmid-Araya
7. C. Hassall
8. U. Brose

Citations in the corpus

• Impacts of Invasive Species on Food Webs: A Review of Empirical Data (2017, background): “Such comparison can either be achieved experimentally (Salvaterra et al., 2013) by compiling data before and after invasion (e.g. Woodward and Hildrew, 2001; Fig.”
• Connectance in stream food webs (2002, background): “Also, previous depictions of the Broadstone Stream food web by Hildrew et al . (1985), Lancaster & Robertson (1995) and Woodward & Hildrew (2001) were included.”
• Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities (2004, background): “…can be abstracted into key traits that determine probable feeding relationships, preferences and magnitudes (Cohen 1989; Warren 1996; Williams & Martinez 2000; Jennings et al. 2001; Hooper et al. 2002; Petchey & Gaston 2002; Woodward & Hildrew 2002; Brown & Gillooly 2003; Cohen et al. 2003).”
• Quantification and Resolution of a Complex, Size-Structured Food Web (2005, background): “Further, sampling eVects were potentially autocorrelated with web size, because speciose communities tend to contain more rare species (Tokeshi, 1999), and species are generally more likely to be detected in the community than their food web linkages characterized adequately (e.g., Goldwasser and Ro”
• Scaling of Food-Web Properties with Diversity and Complexity Across Ecosystems (2010, background): “Ultimately, an adequate sampling effort can only be guaranteed if yield–effort curves demonstrate saturation in link richness with sampling effort for every food web (Ings et al., 2009; Woodward and Hildrew, 2001) or if extrapolation methods suggest a high sampling coverage (Brose and Martinez, 2004”
• Across ecosystem comparisons of size structure: methods, approaches and prospects (2011, unknown): “(Woodward and Hildrew 2001); 33.”
• The effects of environmental warming on Odonata: a review (2008, background): “However, a brief comparison between the common fish Gasterosteus aculeatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Hynes 1950) and detailed studies of Ischnura elegans (Thompson 1978a) and Cordulegaster boltonii (Donovan, 1807) (Woodward & Hildrew 2001) reveals a range of similarities in size and diet.”
• Chapter 5 - Food Web Structure and Stability in 20 Streams Across a Wide pH Gradient (2010, methodology): “Due to logistic constraints, it was not possible to document completely the diets of macroinvertebrate predators or fishes, given that several hundred guts are typically required to describe accurately the links for only one consumer species in even a single, species-poor food web (e.g. Ings et al.,”
• Exotic crayfish in a brown water stream: effects on juvenile trout, invertebrates and algae (2003, background): “E-mail: patrik.stenroth@limnol.lu.se Freshwater Biology (2003) 48, 466–475 466 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd degree of omnivory may characterise many stream food webs (e.g. Hildrew, Townsend & Hasham, 1985; Pringle & Hamazaki, 1998; Woodward & Hildrew, 2001; Schmid-Araya et al., 2002).”
• Connectance of species interaction networks and conservation value: Is it any good to be well connected? (2012, background): “…effect None Qualitative Yes Townsend et al., 1998 Stream food web Invasion by dragonfly No expectation C higher on invaded Negative Qualitative No Woodward and Hildrew, 2001 Plant-pollinator (visitation networks) Alien vs. native plants No expectation C lower on aliens Positive Qualitative Yes…”
• Predator–prey body size, interaction strength and the stability of a real food web (2004, background): “The Ythan Estuary food web represents one of just a few food webs for which body size, abundance and biomass are known (deRuiter et al. 1995; Woodward & Hildrew 2001; Neutel et al. 2002; Cohen, Jonsson & Carpenter 2003).”
• Body‐size determinants of niche overlap and intraguild predation within a complex food web (2002, background): “The predators can also be subdivided into foraging modes: sit-and-wait ( C . boltonii , P . conspersa and M . nebulosa ) vs. searching predators ( S . fuliginosa and the two pentaneurid tanypods) and interstitial ( S . fuliginosa and the tanypods) vs. epibenthic species ( C . boltonii and P . conspe”