U.S. Food and Nutrition Programs

By H. Hoynes, D. Schanzenbach. 2015

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81b976fffd0517e946e8e66e68c760b7d25122b9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Thomas Piketty
2. Emmanuel Saez
3. G. Zucman
4. Stefanie Stantcheva
5. H. Kleven
6. Raj Chetty
7. Anna Lusardi
8. C. Kreiner

In General Health Professions

1. G. Zucman
2. Thomas Piketty
3. Emmanuel Saez

In Safety Research

1. G. Zucman
2. Thomas Piketty
3. Emmanuel Saez

Citations in the corpus

• Distributional,National,Accounts: Methods,and,Estimates,for,the,United,States (2018, background): “27Food stamps is not a monetary transfer strictly speaking as it must be used to buy food but it is almost equivalent to cash in practice as food expenditures exceed benefits for most families (see Currie, 2003 for a survey).”
• Partial Identification Methods for Evaluating Food Assistance Programs: A Case Study of the Causal Impact of SNAP on Food Insecurity (2017, unknown): “2012; Gundersen and Oliveira, 2001; and Currie 2003). Currie (2003) makes this point directly: “.”