Religion and Preferences for Social Insurance

By Kenneth F. Scheve, D. Stasavage. 2006

507 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81b3c1db97b045ea6ac29a593c691be4bf5d8b81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Orsolya Lelkes
2. Ben W. Ansell
3. Silja Häusermann
4. J. Gingrich
5. Hanna Schwander
6. Andrew E. Clark
7. Philipp Rehm
8. Thomas R. Cusack

In Gender Studies

1. Noam Lupu
2. J. Gingrich
3. Andrew E. Clark
4. Philipp Rehm
5. Thomas R. Cusack
6. David A. Lake
7. Torben Iversen
8. Ben W. Ansell

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Silja Häusermann
2. Marius R. Busemeyer
3. Stefanie Walter
4. Ben W. Ansell
5. Philipp Rehm
6. Thomas Kurer
7. Hanna Schwander
8. David Rueda

Citations in the corpus

• Open economy politics: A critical review (2009, background): “Research shows that religion ( Scheve and Stasavage 2006 ) and gender differences (Burgoon and Hiscox 2003; Goldstein et al. 2007) are important to how individuals experience or interpret their economic policy interests.”
• Deliver us from evil: religion as insurance (2007, background): “Reinikka and Svensson (2004) note that the religious are altruists, caring about what happens to others.”
• Preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis over 33 countries (2011, methodology): “Clark and Lelkes [14] and Scheve and Stasavage [38] highlight the role of religion as a substitute to public redistribution.”
• High-skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences (2015, background): “Beliefs about the deservingness of welfare beneficiaries, social mobility, luck as a determinant of economic success and religious orientations influence these norms (Linos and West, 2003; Bénabou and Tirole, 2006; Scheve and Stasavage, 2006; van Oorschot, 2006).”
• Preferences in Context (2012, methodology): “To control for the anti-redistribution effect of religiosity hypothesized by Scheve and Stasavage (2006), we use an 8-point measure of religious attendance.”
• Does Religion Mitigate Tunneling? Evidence from Chinese Buddhism (2014, background): “4 Meditation is viewed as the other leg and wisdom as an emergent third element. property (Gill and Lundsgaarde 2004; McCleary and Barro 2006; Scheve and Stasavage 2006).”