Evolution of modeling of the economics of global warming: changes in the DICE model, 1992–2017
By William Nordhaus. Climatic Change, 2018
186 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81a3631e217aa4383883a522cc942c83c701e16b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Daniel J. A. Johansson
- Mark C. Freeman
- B. Groom
- M. Drupp
- F. Nesje
- Martin C. Hänsel
- T. Sterner
- Christian Azar
In Environmental Engineering
- Daniel J. A. Johansson
- Mark C. Freeman
- B. Groom
- M. Drupp
- F. Nesje
- Martin C. Hänsel
- T. Sterner
- Christian Azar
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Daniel J. A. Johansson
- Mark C. Freeman
- B. Groom
- M. Drupp
- F. Nesje
- Martin C. Hänsel
- T. Sterner
- Christian Azar
Citations in the corpus
- Climate economics support for the UN climate targets (2020, methodology): “228 These are: (1) A carbon cycle based on the FAIR model29,30, (2) an update of the energy balance model37, 229 (3) a revised economic damage estimate28, (4) a range of expert views on intergenerational welfare24, 230 (5) non-CO2 forcing in line with lower emission pathways31, (6) the earlier avail”
- The impact of climate conditions on economic production. Evidence from a global panel of regions (2020, methodology): “5 illustrates the different damage functions obtained based on our estimates and compares them to the damage function used in the DICE 2016R model (Nordhaus, 2018).”