The appropriate total ranking method using DEA for multiple categorized purposes
By H. Noguchi, Masaru Ogawa, Hiroaki Ishii. 2002
124 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/818516b4bc149f03c0b8015d757b187944fe701c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Francisco Javier Santos-Arteaga
- Madjid Tavana
- Mehdi Soltanifar
- Dennis Hilgers
- Hannes W. Lampe
- F. Liu
- H. Hai
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Francisco Javier Santos-Arteaga
- Madjid Tavana
- Mehdi Soltanifar
- Dennis Hilgers
- Hannes W. Lampe
- F. Liu
- H. Hai
Citations in the corpus
- The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier (2005, methodology): “Noguchi et al. (2002) have shown that different weights among objects give rise to different results in ranking.”
- Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA (2015, background): “…administrative Approaches to conduct the evaluation in the collective context and further perform an adequate selection are stated (Hashimoto, 1997; Noguchi et al., 2002; 27 (11.69) 18 (7.79) systems (231 / 6.48 / 3.77) Obata and Ishii, 2003) Collective evaluation and selection of…”
- Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution (2021, background): “Noguchi et al. (2002) defined weight constraints using a strong order and provided a way to rank candidates when considering multiple criteria.”