Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research: Memory, Development, and Rationality: An Integrative Theory of Judgment and Decision Making

By Valerie F. Reyna, F. Lloyd, Charles J. Brainerd. 2003

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8169867113b2b44d3497b0419e68a86248886815

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. J. Holup
2. Melissa L. Finucane
3. Paul Slovic
4. Ellen Peters

In General Decision Sciences

1. J. Holup
2. Melissa L. Finucane
3. Paul Slovic
4. Ellen Peters
5. T. Terpstra

Citations in the corpus

• Heuristics and Biases as Measures of Critical Thinking: Associations with Cognitive Ability and Thinking Dispositions (2008, unknown): “The rational thinking tendencies measured by these heuristics and biases tasks are probably multifarious (Parker & Fischhoff, 2005; Reyna et al., 2003; Stanovich 2008a, 2008b; Toplak, Liu, Macpherson, Toneatto, & Stanovich, 2007).”
• Risk as Value: Combining Affect and Analysis in Risk Judgments (2006, methodology): “For instance, in a study of medical expertise, Reyna et al. (2003) reported that compared with non-expert physicians, expert cardiologists processed fewer dimensions of information and also processed those dimensions in a cruder all-or-none fashion (patients were either at risk or not at risk of an…”