Effect of probiotic Bacillus subtilis Ch9 for grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes, 1844), on growth performance, digestive enzyme activities and intestinal microflora

By Zhixin Wu, X. Feng, L. Xie, X. Peng, J. Yuan, Xiaoxuan Chen. 2012

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Summary In the present study, Bacillus subtilis Ch9 was evaluated as a probiotic in grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes, 1844). For 56 days the grass carp (50 ± 2.5 g) were given a feed containing B. subtilis Ch9 in three concentrations: 1.0 × 109 (T1), 3.0 × 109 (T2) and 5.0 × 109 (T3) CFU kg−1 feed in triplicate treatments. The control group (T0) was given feed without B. subtilis Ch9 for the same period. Determined were the specific growth rate (SGR), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and digestive enzyme activities in the intestine and hepatopancreas as well as the intestinal microflora. After 56 days, fish receiving the diets supplemented with B. subtilis Ch9 showed significantly higher SGR and lower FCR (P   0.05) by the dietary treatments. From days 14 to 56 of the experiment, higher protease, amylase and lipase activities in the foregut, midgut hindgut and hepatopancreas were observed in T1, T2 and T3 (P   0.05), but the ratio of Bacillus was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than in control fish. The total anaerobic bacterial quantity, Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in fish fed B. subtilis Ch9 compared with fish fed control feed. In conclusion, an optimum dose of B. subtilis Ch9 could modulate intestinal microflora, induce digestive enzyme activity and potentially promote the digestion and absorption of nutrients, as well as improve the growth performance of grass carp significantly.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Immunology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/816982f37b154ba8eb15179850e3359349bc10a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

  1. S. Hoseinifar
  2. E. Ringø
  3. Mahmoud A. O. Dawood
  4. Maryam Dadar
  5. Hien Van Doan
  6. K. Ghosh
  7. Vikash Kumar
  8. Suvra Roy

In Immunology

  1. S. Hoseinifar
  2. E. Ringø
  3. Mahmoud A. O. Dawood
  4. Maryam Dadar
  5. Hien Van Doan
  6. K. Ghosh
  7. Vikash Kumar
  8. Suvra Roy

Citations in the corpus