The Limits to Globalization Theory: A Geographic Perspective on Global Economic Change*
By Henry S. C. Yeung. 2002
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/815b1cc60bc89b750e72cff7597e0a189a99edb2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cultural Studies
In Political Science and International Relations
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Regulating economic globalization (2004, background): “4 For example, Henry Yeung (2002) has argued that varying discourses of globalization (e.g. US-led attacks on protectionism) and globalism (e.g. constructions of scalar geographies to ‘convince social and economic Instead, it is to argue that in tracing the effects of TNCs in world poverty and inequ”
- Rethinking relational economic geography (2005, background): “This relational definition of geographical scales is important to our understanding of the scalar restructuring effects of globalization ( Yeung 1998 2002; Amin 2002 2004; Peck and Yeung 2003; Flusty 2004).”
- Practicing New Economic Geographies: A Methodological Examination (2003, background): “For example, insights from the above review of the literature show that even such a crucial analytical category as ‘‘the firm’’ can no longer be conceived as a ‘‘black box’’ stabilized by purely economic transactions (see also Yeung 2000c, 2002d; Dicken and Malmberg 2001; Taylor and Asheim 2001).”
- Theorizing Economic Geographies of Asia (2003, background): “…to say about the geographic specificities of globalization in relation to the origins, processes, and outcomes of globalization (see Amin 1997; Yeung 1998b, 2002b; Kelly 1999; Peck and Yeung 2003).3 Put in this perspective, economic geography research on Asian diasporas and their global…”