Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar
By Holger Diessel. 2006
376 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8137b39d892179419b804f935d068dd4798306c7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- Pragmatic markers: the missing link between language and Theory of Mind (2020, background): “Diessel (2006) characterized the evolution of demonstrative forms into anaphoric demonstratives and definite articles as an evolution of the corresponding communicative functions: ‘Deictic>Anaphoric>Definite’ (p. 477).”
- The grammar of engagement I: framework and initial exemplification (2017, background): “(Diessel, 2006, p. 470) Demonstratives generally distinguish a reasonably large set of ontological categories – entities (this), places (here), times (now), manners (thus), and so forth, welded together with deictics into sets like koko/soko/asoko ‘here / there [28] However, while both Maaka and…”
- Neural correlates of processing case in adults and children. (2025, unknown): “Such early acquisition of demonstratives is common across languages (Gonz ´ alez-Pe ˜ na, Doherty, & Guijarro-Fuentes, 2020) and possibly related to the high frequency of pointing behavior in child-directed speech (Diessel, 2006).”