Escape movements of family groups of wild boar Sus scrofa influenced by drive hunts in Lower Saxony, Germany

By G. Sodeikat, K. Pohlmeyer. Wildlife Biology, 2003

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8133d3d4c0306633d59d7856845e258e19ecc14a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

1. T. Campbell
2. D. Long
3. G. Ericsson
4. G. Spong
5. Henrik Thurfjell
6. Achim Zeileis
7. É. Baubet

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. T. Campbell
2. D. Long
3. G. Ericsson
4. G. Spong
5. Henrik Thurfjell
6. Stéphane Dray
7. Pierre Legendre
8. R. Niels

In Small Animals

1. T. Campbell
2. D. Long
3. G. Ericsson
4. G. Spong
5. Henrik Thurfjell

Citations in the corpus

• Factors affecting wild boar abundance across an environmental gradient in Spain (2006, background): “There have been sev eral stud ies on hab i tat in flu ences on wild boar bi ol ogy (Caley 1993, Boitani et al. 1995a, Welander 2000, Cahill et al. 2003, Schley and Roper 2003, Sodeikat and Pohlmeyer 2003, Fernández-Llario 2004).”
• Reproductive parameters of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in three different parts of Germany (2007, background): “population (Sodeikat and Pohlmeyer 2003).”
• Feral swine damage and damage management in forested ecosystems. (2009, methodology): “Behavioral plasticity was also demonstrated in Lower Saxony, Germany where 60% of feral swine remained within their home ranges following hunting with dogs and 40% moved 6 km, but returned within 6 weeks (Sodeikat and Pohlmeyer, 2003).”
• Responding to spatial and temporal variations in predation risk: space use of a game species in a changing landscape of fear (2009, background): “Consequently, its use of space changes markedly when the risk of being predated (through hunting) starts (Boitani et al. 1994; Sodeikat and Pohlmeyer 2003; Keuling et al.”
• Effects of hunting on wild boar Sus scrofa behaviour (2013, background): “Difference in dog size used; terriers , 15 kg were used in Germany (O. Keuling, pers. comm.) and medium-sized dogs of 20- 40 kg were used in our study.”
• Do intensive drive hunts affect wild boar (Sus scrofa) spatial behaviour in Italy? Some evidences and management implications (2010, result): “According to other studies (Maillard 1996; Brandt et al. 1998; Sodeikat and Pohlmeyer 2003), these displacements of family groups are usually short lived since they return to their familiar areas at the end of hunting season.”