A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001--2010

259 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The reliability of acceptability judgments across languages (2018, methodology): “In reality, however, such judgments are also fairly common in the sample from Linguistic Inquiry investigated by Sprouse et al. (2013), e.g.: (4) a.”
Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian (2016, methodology): “Because Sprouse et al. (2013) created multiple tokens of each sentence type, we were able to use a distinct token for each filler sentence type for each of the four English experiments.”
SNAP judgments: A small N acceptability paradigm (SNAP) for linguistic acceptability judgments (2016, methodology): “In this article, we first present the results of a large-scale replication of the Sprouse et al. 2013 study on 100 English contrasts randomly sampled from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010 and tested in both a forced-choice experiment and an acceptability rating experiment.”