The CoNLL-2010 Shared Task: Learning to Detect Hedges and their Scope in Natural Language Text
By Richárd Farkas, V. Vincze, György Móra, J. Csirik, György Szarvas. CoNLL Shared Task, 2010
327 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8111a8b7831332e45cceda8572ed19603c2fb02a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Iryna Gurevych
- Andreas Vlachos
- Sebastian Riedel
- Ivan Habernal
- James Thorne
- Mohit Bansal
- Neema Kotonya
- Patrick Lewis
Citations in the corpus
- Fact Checking: Task definition and dataset construction (2014, methodology): “Statement extraction could be tackled as a sentence classification problem, following approaches similar to those proposed for speculation detection (Farkas et al., 2010) and veridicality assessment (de Marneffe et al.”
- Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse (2016, background): “”), or weasel20 phrases (Farkas et al. 2010) (“In some cases, inclusion can work fantastically well.”
- Sentiment Analysis: An Overview from Linguistics (2016, unknown): “Examples of cues are: adjectives and adverbs (probable, likely, possible); modal verbs (may, might, could); verbs of speculation (suggest, suspect, suppose, seem); and a range of multiword cues (no evidence/proof that, raise the possibility/question, whether or not) (Farkas et al 2010).”