Practitioner's guide to empirically based measures of anxiety

By Martin M. Antony, S. Orsillo, L. Roemer. 2002

448 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/810f16401d7c065c24b54a28c96495ed18102156

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Being Inconsistent About Consistency: When Coefficient Alpha Does and Doesn't Matter (2003, background): “…example, pictures it as having different facets (e.g., cognitive, affective, behavioral, physiological) that are themselves correlated only poorly (Antony, 2001), then these criteria for scale development would be applied to the subscales tapping each facet individually and not to the scale as a…”
Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency (2003, background): “Moreover, these do not always respond in concert and the correlations among them may be quite modest (Antony, 2001).”
Addiction to mobile text messaging applications is nothing to “lol” about (2014, methodology): “The participants’ social anxiety ( ̨ = .90) s assessed with 20 items obtained from the social hobia/anxiety scale of Orsillo and Hammond (2001) nd translated into Arabic by Al-Banna, Abdel-Khalek, nd Mourad (2006), anchored with “Not at All” and Extremely.””
A Meta-Analytic Review of Adult Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Outcome Across the Anxiety Disorders (2007, methodology): “Reported average effect sizes derived only from established measures identified in Antony et al. (2001) for each anxiety diagnosis and are weighted by sample size.”
A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. (2006, methodology): “This study reports the development and validation of a measure for evaluating the presence and severity of GAD in clinical practice, the GAD-7, one of the few GAD measures that is also specifically linked to the DSM-IV (Text Revision) criteria.(19,26) A score of 10 or greater on the GAD-7 represents”