Accurate design of megadalton-scale two-component icosahedral protein complexes

By J. Bale, S. Gonen, Yuxi Liu, W. Sheffler, Daniel Ellis, C. Thomas, D. Cascio, Todd O. Yeates, Tamir Gonen, Neil P. King and 1 more. 2016

524 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Designed to assemble Symmetric macromolecular structures that form cages, such as viral capsids, have inspired protein engineering. Bale et al. used pairwise combinations of dimeric, trimeric, or pentameric building blocks to design two-component, 120-subunit protein complexes with three distinct icosahedral architectures. The capsid-like nanostructures are large enough to hold nucleic acids or other proteins, and because they have two components, the assembly of cargoes such as drugs and vaccines can be done in a controlled way. Science, this issue p. 389 A computational approach helped in the design of 120-subunit icosahedral protein cages capable of packaging macromolecular cargo. Nature provides many examples of self- and co-assembling protein-based molecular machines, including icosahedral protein cages that serve as scaffolds, enzymes, and compartments for essential biochemical reactions and icosahedral virus capsids, which encapsidate and protect viral genomes and mediate entry into host cells. Inspired by these natural materials, we report the computational design and experimental characterization of co-assembling, two-component, 120-subunit icosahedral protein nanostructures with molecular weights (1.8 to 2.8 megadaltons) and dimensions (24 to 40 nanometers in diameter) comparable to those of small viral capsids. Electron microscopy, small-angle x-ray scattering, and x-ray crystallography show that 10 designs spanning three distinct icosahedral architectures form materials closely matching the design models. In vitro assembly of icosahedral complexes from independently purified components occurs rapidly, at rates comparable to those of viral capsids, and enables controlled packaging of molecular cargo through charge complementarity. The ability to design megadalton-scale materials with atomic-level accuracy and controllable assembly opens the door to a new generation of genetically programmable protein-based molecular machines.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology, Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, AI for Physical Sciences

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. William F. DeGrado
  2. I. Korendovych
  3. David Baker
  4. Po-Ssu Huang
  5. Scott E. Boyken
  6. Enrique Marcos
  7. Daniel‐Adriano Silva
  8. Neil P. King

In Molecular Biology

  1. David Baker
  2. Enrique Marcos
  3. Po-Ssu Huang
  4. William F. DeGrado
  5. I. Korendovych
  6. Frank DiMaio
  7. Daniel‐Adriano Silva
  8. Tanja Kortemme

In Computational Biology & Bioinformatics

  1. Po-Ssu Huang
  2. David Baker
  3. Frank DiMaio
  4. William F. DeGrado
  5. Tommi S. Jaakkola
  6. Enrique Marcos
  7. I. Korendovych
  8. John Ingraham

In AI for Physical Sciences

  1. David Baker
  2. Frank DiMaio
  3. Regina Barzilay
  4. Enrique Marcos
  5. Tommi S. Jaakkola
  6. Joost Snijder
  7. A. Lanzavecchia
  8. D. Veesler

Citations in the corpus