The evaluation of key comparison data
By M. Cox. 2002
453 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/810aacdb15e62499c3d7c3de95a692642545844a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Comparison of calibration curves using the Lp norm (2009, background): “This situation, that still needs to be addressed by appropriate guidelines, typically occurs either when ‘‘several traveling standards (are) circulated [and (need) to be treated] together’’ or when a standard has ‘‘to be measured at each of a number of stipulated values of a parameter, such as wavel”
- Laboratory effects models for interlaboratory comparisons (2009, methodology): “Cox [5] suggests the weighted average (Model W) as the preferred method for calculating a RV, provided a statistical test is carried out using the statistic vOBS 2 = (x1 xREF) /u1 2”