An impact evaluation of education, health, and water supply investments by the Bolivian social investment fund

By J. Newman, M. Pradhan, Laura B. Rawlings, Geert Ridder, R. Coa, J. L. Evia. 2002

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81064b711e531666b44fe67de4049e94a6c7bdda

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

In Economics and Econometrics

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Timing and Duration of Exposure in Evaluations of Social Programs (2008, unknown): “Because of the demand-driven nature of the Bolivia Social Investment Fund, for instance, not all communities selected for active promotion applied for and received a SIF-funded education project, but some communities not selected for active promotion nevertheless applied for promotion and obtained a”
Improving Learning in Primary Schools of Developing Countries (2015, background): “(2010) reports results for binary indicators of learning outcomes, while the outcome measures in several papers did not include language or mathematics (Seshadri & Gopaldas, 1989; Kvalsig, Cooppan, & Connolly, 1991; Newman et al., 2002; Clarke et al., 2008; Lien et al., 2009; Beuermann et al., 2012)”
Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs (2005, unknown): “21 From the description of the Newman et al. (2002) study it appears that this is how randomization was defended to the relevant authorities in their case. mining the returns to participation.22 The extent of this problem depends on the specific program and setting; selective compliance is more…”
The Social Impact of Social Funds in Jamaica: A ‘Participatory Econometric’ Analysis of Targeting, Collective Action, and Participation in Community-Driven Development (2005, methodology): “Previous research on CDD has tended to use either survey data from large samples [for example, Paxson and Schady, 2002; Newman et al., 2002], or qualitative information from assessments of beneficiary communities (termed ‘beneficiary assessments’) that received funding [for example, Owen and van Dom”
Nonexperimental Versus Experimental Estimates of Earnings Impacts (2003, result): “This criterion excludes, for example, a study of education programs in Bolivia (Newman et al. 2001), which compared findings from an experimental design in one region with findings from a NX design in another.”