The relationship between growth and mortality for seven co‐occurring tree species in the southern Appalachian Mountains
By Pete Wyckoff, James S. Clark. 2002
216 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80e82e49291e93c463fbf4993d51b2abe00ef9f2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- Charles D. Canham
- K. David Coates
- C. Bigler
- Phillip J. van Mantgem
- N. Stephenson
- James S. Clark
- John J. Battles
- Harald Bugmann
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Charles D. Canham
- James S. Clark
- K. David Coates
- C. Bigler
- Phillip J. van Mantgem
- N. Stephenson
- Harald Bugmann
- Roel Brienen
Citations in the corpus
- High‐dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence (2010, background): “…and Clark 2008), summarized in this analysis by their effects on light availability, the ECA k. Data on tree growth (Clark et al. 2007b), survival (Wyckoff and Clark 2002, Metcalf et al. 2009), canopy exposure to light (Wyckoff and Clark 2005), and maturation and fecundity (Clark et al. 2004)…”
- Lifetime growth patterns and ages of Bolivian rain forest trees obtained by tree ring analysis (2006, background): “Slow growing juveniles have a higher probability of mortality as they stay longer in the understorey (Swaine et al. 1987; Terborgh et al. 1997; Arets 2005) and juvenile mortality is higher for suppressed trees (Kobe et al. 1995; Wyckoff & Clark 2002).”
- Detecting evidence for CO2 fertilization from tree ring studies: The potential role of sampling biases (2012, background): “The length of these periods of reduced growth varies from several years [Wyckoff and Clark, 2002] to several decades [Pedersen, 1998].”
- Growth-dependent tree mortality models based on tree rings (2003, background): “Shugart 1984; Bugmann 2001; Wyckoff and Clark 2002 ).”
- Competition, species interaction and ageing control tree mortality in boreal forests (2011, background): “…al. 2002), previous studies have focused on competition-driven mortality and typically have been restricted to a limited range of stand developmental stages (e.g. Lutz &Halpern 2006) or juvenile trees such as seedlings and saplings under forest canopy (e.g. Kobe et al. 1995; Wyckoff & Clark 2002).”
- Size‐dependence of growth and mortality influence the shade tolerance of trees in a lowland temperate rain forest (2009, unknown): “1995; Wyckoff & Clark 2002; Lin et al .”
- The relationship between tree growth patterns and likelihood of mortality: a study of two tree species in the Sierra Nevada (2007, methodology): “As is assumed in many studies (e.g., Pacala et al. 1996; Yao et al. 2001; Wyckoff and Clark 2002), average diameter growth was an indicator of a given tree’s health.”
- Factors predisposing episodic drought‐induced tree mortality in Nothofagus– site, climatic sensitivity and growth trends (2004, background): “2000; Wyckoff & Clark 2002).”
- Growth, mortality, and morphological response of European beech and downy oak along a light gradient in sub-Mediterranean forest (2005, background): “Among these few studies, most have been conducted in temperate areas in North America or in Europe (Pacala et al. 1996; Wyckoff and Clark 2002; Bigler and Bugmann 2003).”
- Sapling size influences shade tolerance ranking among southern boreal tree species (2006, methodology): “The few studies that have evaluated the effect of size on the risk of mortality, compared overstorey and understorey trees ( Wyckoff & Clark 2002 ) in which differences in both size-dependent growth and environmental conditions would be expected to be extreme.”
- Causes and implications of the correlation between forest productivity and tree mortality rates (2011, background): “Within a given species, recent growth rate usually is negatively correlated with mortality rate (i.e., rapidly growing trees are the least likely to die, slowly growing trees the most likely to die; e.g., Buchman et al. 1983, Wyckoff and Clark 2002, Bigler and Bugmann 2004).”
- Competition alters tree growth responses to climate at individual and stand scales (2015, unknown): “…because growth plays a key role in determining forest composition, structure, and function, both directly through physiological processes (e.g., biomass production) and indirectly through the influence of growth on survival and population dynamics (Moorcroft et al. 2001; Wyckoff and Clark 2002).”
- A NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS OF TREE GROWTH AND SURVIVAL IN A HURRICANE‐DRIVEN TROPICAL FOREST (2004, background): “…the notion that tropical tree life histories may not obey simplistic tradeoffs between shade tolerance and the ability to grow in full sun but rather display complex ontogenies in response to gradients in light availability (Swaine and Whitmore 1988, Clark and Clark 1992, Wyckoff and Clark 2002).”
- Increased early growth rates decrease longevities of conifers in subalpine forests (2009, background): “The observed negative relationships between early growth rate and longevity complement numerous studies on tree mortality, which generally found positive relationships between growth rates during the last ca 3� 40 years prior to tree death and short-term survival probabilities (Keane et al. 2001, W”
- Using dynamic vegetation models to simulate plant range shifts (2014, background): “Although progress has been made over the past 15 yr in the statistical modeling of tree mortality (Wyckoff and Clark 2002, Bigler and Bugmann 2004, Wunder et al. 2008), the existing models do not lend themselves for integration into DVMs because their structure and parameter values appear to vary…”
- Density-dependent tree mortality in pinyon-juniper woodlands (2008, unknown): “048 suggesting that radial growth rate may provide a useful indicator for the ability of a tree to defend itself against attack (Wyckoff and Clark, 2002; Bigler and Bugmann, 2003).”