Pay-offs and penalties of competing migratory schedules

By R. Drent, C. Both, Martin Green, J. Madsen, T. Piersma. 2003

266 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80ddd87714fb4b2789f321f198bb4be2a37d2814

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. T. Piersma
2. R. Drent
3. S. Cooke
4. S. Hinch
5. M. Visser
6. C. Both
7. J. Stahl
8. G. Gauthier

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. C. Both
2. M. Visser
3. T. Piersma
4. R. Drent
5. S. Cooke
6. Anthony David Fox
7. S. Skagen
8. J. Gils

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. S. Cooke
2. S. Hinch
3. D. Patterson
4. A. Farrell
5. G. Crossin
6. A. Lotto
7. T. Piersma
8. G. Kraak

Citations in the corpus

• Using the power of comparison to explain habitat use and migration strategies of shorebirds worldwide (2007, background): “2006) suggests that relative plumage redness within populations is a honest quality signal, perhaps correlated with health, disease resistance and/or age (Piersma et al. 2001a, b; Drent et al. 2003; Battley 2007).”
• Cross-seasonal effects and the dynamics of waterfowl populations (2014, background): “Second, reduced availability of agricultural habitats for Pink-footed Geese Anser brachyrhynchus during spring migration in Norway reduced both nutritional status of migrating geese and their subsequent reproductive success (Drent et al. 2003).”
• HOW DO MAGELLANIC PENGUINS COPE WITH VARIABILITY IN THEIR ACCESS TO PREY (2005, background): “…one site to another (Benoit et al. 1993, Korpimake et al. 1994), and ultimately the extent to which lifetime reproductive success can be maximized by animals spending an appreciable proportion of their time in one location while their offspring is at another (Drent et al. 2003, Hedenström 2003).”
• Exposure to high temperature influences the behaviour, physiology, and survival of sockeye salmon during spawning migration (2008, background): “Given the highly adaptive nature of migration timing, not only in salmon but in many other organisms (Brown and Brown 2000; Drent et al. 2003; Prop et al. 2003; Be ˆty t al. 2004), serious fitness consequences are expected when migration dates deviate significantly from historic averages.”
• Climate change and its impact on Australia's avifauna (2005, background): “…food supply by significantly increasing their incubation period (e.g. Cresswell and McCleery 2003), mismatching of hatching and peak food availability has already affected reproductive success in others (Visser et al. 1998; Both and Visser 2001; Coppack and Both 2002; Drent et al. 2003; Sanz 2003).”
• MIGRATION STOPOVERS AND THE CONSERVATION OF ARCTIC-BREEDING CALIDRIDINE SANDPIPERS (2006, background): “Events in one phase of a bird’s annual cycle clearly can infl uence survival or reproductive success in a subsequent phase (Sandberg and Moore 1996, Marra et al. 1998, Gill et al. 2001, Drent et al. 2003, Baker et al. 2004, Morrison 2006).”
• Global Climate Change Leads to Mistimed Avian Reproduction (2004, background): “Most species of long distance migrants arrive at the breeding grounds some time before they start breeding in an average year, which gives them some flexibility to anticipate natural variation in the advancement of spring between years (Drent et al., 2003).”
• The effect of climate change on the correlation between avian life‐history traits (2005, background): “Caterpillars are commonly fed to early broods and their importance declines over the season (von Haartman, 1954), matching the seasonal decline in fitness (Lack, 1966; Bauchau & Seinen, 1997; Siikamäki, 1998; Drent et al., 2003).”
• Rates of mass gain and energy deposition in red knot on their final spring staging site is both time‐ and condition‐dependent (2007, background): “In spring, Arctic-breeding shorebirds are on a strict timetable to arrive in their breeding areas in time to breed successfully during the short summer ( Drent et al . 2003 ).”
• Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots Calidris canutus. II. Patch choice and length of working day (2005, background): “This study adds to the growing evidence that delayed migration bears fitness-costs (e.g. Schneider & Harrington 1981; Zwarts et al. 1992; Kokko 1999; Drent et al. 2003).”
• Sociable schedules: interplay between avian seasonal and social behaviour (2006, background): “…determine the precise time of breeding, accounting for state and year-to-year differences in environmental conditions, because their reproductive schedules are often limited by resource availability (Wingfield 1980; Moore 1982; Stevenson & Bryant 2000; Chastel et al. 2003; Drent et al. 2003).”
• Climatic effects on timing of spring migration and breeding in a long‐distance migrant, the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca (2005, unknown): “…to adjust their breeding cycle to changes in their main food sources because they rely on a sequence of areas during migration that may change at different rates (Drent et al. 2003), and which may not provide information on the phenologi- cal state of their breeding areas (Coppack and Both 2002).”