Characterization of mechanical behavior of woven fabrics: Experimental methods and benchmark results

By Jian Cao, R. Akkerman, P. Boisse, Julie Chen, H. S. Cheng, E. D. Graaf, J. Gorczyca, P. Harrison, G. Hivet, J. Launay and 16 more. 2008

658 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The bias-extension test for the analysis of in-plane shear properties of textile composite reinforcements and prepregs: a review (2017, methodology): “Denoting SB and SC the initial areas of zone B and C [25, 33]:”
Uncertainty in the manufacturing of fibrous thermosetting composites: A review (2014, background): “The forming/draping stage of the manufacturing process causes significant shear deformation in the case of doubly curved components [19].”
Simulation of wrinkling during textile composite reinforcement forming. Influence of tensile, in-plane shear and bending stiffnesses (2011, methodology): “The corresponding shear angle is called the locking angle (in order of 40°- 45° for textile composite reinforcements [13, 36]).”
Hencky-type discrete model for pantographic structures: numerical comparison with second gradient continuum models (2016, background): “However, we believe that the potential scope of the presented model is wider: it very likely may include the most relevant deformation phenomena in the woven fabrics described in [12–19].”
A semi‐discrete shell finite element for textile composite reinforcement forming simulation (2009, background): “This has been underlined by an international benchmark where the same textile reinforcement has been tested by several labs [43].”