Cortical Processing of Noxious Somatosensory Stimuli in the Persistent Vegetative State
By S. Laureys, M. Faymonville, P. Peigneux, P. Damas, B. Lambermont, G. Fiore, Christian Degueldre, J. Aerts, André Luxen, G. Franck and 3 more. NeuroImage, 2002
419 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Neurology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80ba9bb386663033ca9bd163a2498bc684a5ca4d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Mark Solms
- Melanie Boly
- Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse
- Gustave Moonen
- Ranulfo Romo
- Steve Majerus
- Steven Laureys
In Epidemiology
In Neurology
Citations in the corpus
- The Conscious Id (2013, background): “Also, activated S1 was isolated from the frontoparietal network thought to be required for consciousness perception (Laureys et al., 2002).”
- Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment (2009, background): “Contrary to patients in VS, those in MCS retain some capacity for cognitive processing and activate similar brain networks relatives to controls following painful stimulation; suggesting that they can experience pain [8,9].”
- Phantom percepts: Tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks (2011, background): “In these persistent vegetative state patients, pain stimuli activate the thalamus and S1, but this primary cortex is functionally disconnected from the secondary somatosensory cortex as well as from the abovementioned awareness areas (43, 46, 47).”