The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (IDS-C) and Self-Report (IDS-SR), and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) and Self-Report…

By Madhukar H. Trivedi, A. Rush, Hicham M. Ibrahim, T. Carmody, M. Biggs, T. Suppes, M. Crismon, K. Shores‐Wilson, M. Toprac, E. Dennehy and 2 more. Psychological Medicine, 2004

927 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80b81899008f3442836db1236b56c6c43ac5f9b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Pharmacology

1. Susan A. Murphy
2. Maurizio Fava
3. Daniel J. Lizotte
4. Michael H. Bowling
5. Michael R. Kosorok
6. Abiral Baniya
7. Donglin Zeng
8. Eric B. Laber

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. Susan A. Murphy

Citations in the corpus

• Rating Scales for Depression (2009, methodology): “In another study on 544 outpatients with MDD and 402 outpatients with bipolar disorder, the Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.81 to 0.94 for all four scales (QIDS-C16, QIDS-SR16, IDS-C30, and IDS-SR30) [ 39 ].”
• Constructing evidence-based treatment strategies using methods from computer science. (2007, methodology): “Symptom severity is defined by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR 16 : Rush et al., 2000;Trivedi et al., 2004;Rush et al., 2003), which is a short and self-report version of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS: Rush et al. 1996).”