The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation

By D. K. Ahorsu, Chung-Ying Lin, V. Imani, M. Saffari, Mark D. Griffiths, Amir H. Pakpour. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2020

3,909 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background The emergence of the COVID-19 and its consequences has led to fears, worries, and anxiety among individuals worldwide. The present study developed the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) to complement the clinical efforts in preventing the spread and treating of COVID-19 cases. Methods The sample comprised 717 Iranian participants. The items of the FCV-19S were constructed based on extensive review of existing scales on fears, expert evaluations, and participant interviews. Several psychometric tests were conducted to ascertain its reliability and validity properties. Results After panel review and corrected item-total correlation testing, seven items with acceptable corrected item-total correlation (0.47 to 0.56) were retained and further confirmed by significant and strong factor loadings (0.66 to 0.74). Also, other properties evaluated using both classical test theory and Rasch model were satisfactory on the seven-item scale. More specifically, reliability values such as internal consistency ( α = .82) and test–retest reliability (ICC = .72) were acceptable. Concurrent validity was supported by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (with depression, r = 0.425 and anxiety, r = 0.511) and the Perceived Vulnerability to Disease Scale (with perceived infectability, r = 0.483 and germ aversion, r = 0.459). Conclusion The Fear of COVID-19 Scale, a seven-item scale, has robust psychometric properties. It is reliable and valid in assessing fear of COVID-19 among the general population and will also be useful in allaying COVID-19 fears among individuals.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Infectious Diseases, Neurology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80b50610ed02f9c7633414c504c818d95a2ccce0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. Jeffrey S Ashby
  2. Kenneth G. Rice
  3. R. Rather
  4. Mark D. Griffiths
  5. L. Labrague
  6. Gökmen Arslan
  7. Mohammed A. Mamun
  8. Sebastian Zenker

In Infectious Diseases

  1. R. Rather

In Neurology

  1. R. Rather
  2. David Gozal

Citations in the corpus