6. Extensions of Respondent-Driven Sampling: Analyzing Continuous Variables and Controlling for Differential Recruitment

By Douglas D. Heckathorn. 2007

420 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80a1a77831b06d7a74fe730c103eee0d460cdf10

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

1. Amber Tomas
2. Krista Gile
3. Douglas D. Heckathorn
4. G. Bauer
5. N. Rotondi
6. Matthew J. Salganik
7. L. A. Goodman
8. Carter T. Butts

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Krista Gile
2. G. Bauer
3. Amber Tomas
4. N. Rotondi
5. Douglas D. Heckathorn
6. L. A. Goodman
7. Carter T. Butts
8. Matthew J. Salganik

Citations in the corpus

• The effect of differential recruitment, non-response and non-recruitment on estimators for respondent-driven sampling (2010, methodology): “Thus, our comparison study is wellpositioned to investigate the contributions of the H- estimator, which claims to adjust for differential recruitment and recruitment effectiveness (Heckathorn, 2007).”
• SNOWBALL VERSUS RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING (2011, methodology): “…as a convenience method for studying hard-to-reach populations (Biernacki and Waldorf 1981); and respondent-driven sampling (RDS), a sampling method with good estimability for studying hard-to-reach populations (Heckathorn 1997, 2002, 2007; Salganik and Heckathorn 2004; Volz and Heckathorn 2008).”
• Depression in Male-to-Female Transgender Ontarians: Results from the Trans PULSE Project (2011, methodology): “Estimates of population prevalences and 95% confidence intervals for MTF Ontarians were obtained using RDSAT version 6.0 (Volz, Wejnert, Degani, & Heckathorn, 2007).”