Basal-like and triple-negative breast cancers: a critical review with an emphasis on the implications for pathologists and oncologists

By S. Badve, D. Dabbs, S. Schnitt, Frederick L. Baehner, T. Decker, V. Eusebi, S. Fox, S. Ichihara, J. Jacquemier, S. Lakhani and 9 more. Modern Pathology, 2011

704 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cancer Research, Dermatology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8086f512e0cfb0fc0dc7f10125bf6b1088767d19

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. D. Holliday
2. V. Speirs

Citations in the corpus

• Choosing the right cell line for breast cancer research (2011, background): “Although there are similarities in the basal and triple-negative phenotypes, the terms are not strictly inter changeable; as outlined in a recent review, there is still no unifying defi nition for basal cancers and, while triple-negative enriches for basal breast cancer, the phenotypes are not ident”