The Indian Buffet Process: An Introduction and Review
By T. Griffiths, Zoubin Ghahramani. 2011
457 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sergey Levine
- Yoshua Bengio
- Mohit Bansal
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Pieter Abbeel
- Eric P. Xing
- Chelsea Finn
- Quoc V. Le
In Statistics and Probability
- David M. Blei
- Charles Sutton
- Rajesh Ranganath
- Zoubin Ghahramani
- Akash Srivastava
- Ryan P. Adams
- Stephen J. Roberts
- Finale Doshi-Velez
Citations in the corpus
- Bayesian Nonparametric Federated Learning of Neural Networks (2019, methodology): “Several extensions to the IBP (and the equivalent BBP) have been developed, see Griffiths & Ghahramani (2011) for a review.”
- Bayesian Structure Adaptation for Continual Learning (2019, methodology): “As described before, to adaptively infer the number of nodes in each hidden layer, we use the IBP prior (Griffiths & Ghahramani, 2011), whose truncated stick-breaking process (Doshi et al., 2009) construction for each entry of B is as follows for d ∈ 1 , ..., D , where D denotes the number of input…”
- Deep Multi-task Representation Learning: A Tensor Factorisation Approach (2016, methodology): “, 2012] models W using linear factor analysis with Indian Buffet Process [Griffiths and Ghahramani, 2011] prior on S.”
- Bayesian group factor analysis with structured sparsity (2016, methodology): “, 2014) puts an Indian buffet process (IBP) prior (Griffiths and Ghahramani, 2011) on the factors, inducing element-wise sparsity, and an ARD prior on the variance of the loadings.”
- Graph-Sparse LDA: A Topic Model with Structured Sparsity (2014, methodology): “Formally, we replace the previous LDA generative process with the following process that introduces ˜ w in as the concept word behind observed word w in : w in | ˜ w in , P ∼ Discrete ( P ˜ w in ) where ⊙ is the element-wise Hadamard product and IBP is the Indian Buffet Process [13].”
- Hidden Parameter Markov Decision Processes: A Semiparametric Regression Approach for Discovering Latent Task Parametrizations (2013, methodology): “Our generative model uses Indian Buffet Processes [8] to model what latent parameters are relevant for a particular set of dynamics and Gaussian processes [9] to model the dynamics functions.”
- Better Optimism By Bayes: Adaptive Planning with Rich Models (2014, background): “A more radical extension would be to something closer to an Indian buffet process (Griffiths and Ghahramani 2011), in which the whole collection of subtasks also share a measure of structure; this should lead to solutions with collaboration among a set of expert solvers.”
- Probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence (2015, methodology): “Elaborating the social network modelling example, an IBP-based model allows each person to belong to some subset of a large number of potential communities (for example, as defined by different families, workplaces, schools, hobbies, and so on) rather than a single community, and the probability of ”
- Scalable inference of topic evolution via models for latent geometric structures (2018, background): “(15) in [10]) with mi denoting the popularity of global topic i.”
- Indian Buffet Neural Networks for Continual Learning (2019, methodology): “The inference for IBP has been performed in several ways, including Gibbs sampling [33, 13], particle filtering [34], slice sampling [35], and using variational inference [12].”
- Spectral Methods for Indian Buffet Process Inference (2014, methodology): “Then the probability of generating a particular matrix Z is given by [18]”
- Discovering latent causes in reinforcement learning (2015, background): “In the Indian buffet process [57], customers enter the buffet and sample each dish (latent cause) with probability proportional to the number of other customers who have previously sampled the dish.”
- General Latent Feature Models for Heterogeneous Datasets (2017, methodology): “In particular, these works assume that databases contain only either continuous data, usually modeled as Gaussian variables [12, 28], or discrete, that can be either modeled by discrete likelihoods [18, 24, 11] or simply treated as Gaussian variables [25, 2, 28].”
- Networks beyond pairwise interactions: structure and dynamics (2020, methodology): “The Indian Buffet Process is defined in similar terms but allows for multiple set memberships.”