Too Little or too much? Exploring U‐shaped Relationships between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Financial Performance

By C. Trumpp, Thomas W. Guenther. 2017

459 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/807b4db88e1b2847360a28823160736c5bf1c806

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Stefan Lewandowski
2. Sergio Manrique
3. Carmen‐Pilar Martí‐Ballester
4. Franziska Sump
5. Alexander Bassen
6. Hidemichi Fujii
7. Shunsuke Managi
8. Timo Busch

In Strategy and Management

1. Stefan Lewandowski
2. Sergio Manrique
3. Carmen‐Pilar Martí‐Ballester
4. Franziska Sump
5. Alexander Bassen
6. Hidemichi Fujii
7. Shunsuke Managi
8. Timo Busch

Citations in the corpus

• Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? (2018, background): “Studies that have found an inverted U-shaped relationship between CFP and corporate environmental performance also provide evidence for the nonlinear relationship (Fujii et al., 2013; Trumpp and Guenther, 2017).”
• Analyzing the Effect of Corporate Environmental Performance on Corporate Financial Performance in Developed and Developing Countries (2017, methodology): “The industry to which the firm belongs is another determinant of corporate financial performance [15,42] due to different intensity of competition among industries and pressures from their stakeholders.”
• Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance Revisited (2020, methodology): “We use the ratio between a firm’s capital expenditures and equity to estimate capital intensity (Trumpp & Guenther, 2017) and expect a positive relationship between capital intensity and financial performance.”