Identification and Gap Analysis of Key Biodiversity Areas: Targets for Comprehensive Protected Area Systems

By P. Langhammer. 2007

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Status of a protected area system in the Hindu Kush-Himalayas: An analysis of PA coverage (2008, methodology): “Recently, Langhammer et al. (2007), using the Key Biodiversity Areas approach, reflected on the conservation gaps, and concluded that many of the key biodiversity components are still outside existing PA networks and suggested the need for a comprehensive conservation strategy to address such gaps.”
Important Plant Areas: revised selection criteria for a global approach to plant conservation (2017, background): “The concept of KBAs has been in use for some time (Eken et al. 2004; Langhammer et al. 2007), and widely employed in a number of geographical regions (e.g., Eken et al. 2004; Gerlach 2008; Kasecker et al. 2009; Paese et al. 2010; Melovski et al. 2012) and ecological zones such as freshwater…”
Identifying priority sites and gaps for the conservation of migratory waterbirds in China's coastal wetlands (2017, background): “…supporting globally threatened species, a significant proportion of the population of specific species or exhibiting high population abundance are considered to have high conservation priority (Margules & Pressey, 2000; Pressey & Taffs, 2001; Langhammer, 2007; Ramsar Convention Secretariat, 2010).”