The first direct double neutron star merger detection: Implications for cosmic nucleosynthesis
By Stephan Rosswog, J. Sollerman, U. Feindt, A. Goobar, Oleg Korobkin, R. Wollaeger, C. Fremling, M. Kasliwal. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2017
146 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Context. The astrophysical r-process site where about half of the elements, heavier than iron are produced, has been a puzzle for several decades. Here we discuss the role of one of the leading ideas – neutron star mergers (NSMs) – in the light of the first direct detection of such an event in both gravitational (GW) and electromagnetic (EM) waves. Aims. Our aim is to understand the implications of the first GW/EM observations of a NSM for cosmic nucleosynthesis. Methods. We analyse bolometric and NIR lightcurves of the first detected double NSM and compare them to nuclear reaction network-based macronova models. Results. The slope of the bolometric lightcurve is consistent with the radioactive decay of neutron star ejecta with Ye ≲ 0.3 (but not larger), which provides strong evidence for an r-process origin of the electromagnetic emission. This rules out in particular “nickel winds” as major source of the emission. We find that the NIR lightcurves can be well fitted either with or without lanthanide-rich ejecta. Our limits on the ejecta mass together with estimated rates directly confirm earlier purely theoretical or indirect observational conclusions that double neutron star mergers are indeed a major site of cosmic nucleosynthesis. If the ejecta mass was typical, NSMs can easily produce all of the estimated Galactic r-process matter, and – depending on the real rate – potentially even more. This could be a hint that the event ejected a particularly large amount of mass, maybe due to a substantial difference between the component masses. This would be compatible with the mass limits obtained from the GW-observation. Conclusions. The recent observations suggests that NSMs are responsible for a broad range of r-process nuclei and that they are at least a major, but likely the dominant r-process site in the Universe.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/806c48156e2eb93013626b117c52af7c89706a22
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- B. Metzger
- E. Quataert
- T. Thompson
- D. Kasen
- Albino Perego
- David Radice
- Luke F. Roberts
- Jonas Lippuner
In Instrumentation
- T. Thompson
- E. Quataert
- B. Metzger
- Oleg Korobkin
- A. Jerkstrand
- Luke F. Roberts
- Krzysztof Belczyński
- Jonas Lippuner
Citations in the corpus
- A Magnetar Origin for the Kilonova Ejecta in GW170817 (2018, background): “4 matter is dominated by a few discrete nuclei (Lippuner & Roberts 2015), inconsistent with the observed smooth decay of the KN bolometric light curve (Rosswog et al. 2017).”
- Binary Neutron Star Mergers: Mass Ejection, Electromagnetic Counterparts, and Nucleosynthesis (2018, methodology): “…et al. 2017; Nicholl et al. 2017; Smartt et al. 2017; Soares-Santos et al. 2017; Tanaka et al. 2017; Tanvir et al. 2017) provided compelling evidence that NS mergers are one of the main sources of r-process elements in the universe (Kasen et al. 2017; Hotokezaka et al. 2018a; Rosswog et al. 2018).”
- The Origin of r-process Elements in the Milky Way (2017, background): “0.3 (Rosswog et al. 2017).”
- Neutron Star Mergers Might Not Be the Only Source of r-process Elements in the Milky Way (2018, background): “In particular, its late-time infrared emission suggests the production of lanthanide elements (e.g., Barnes & Kasen 2013; Fernández & Metzger 2016; Tanvir et al. 2017; Wollaeger et al. 2018, but see Rosswog et al. 2018; Wanajo 2018; Wu et al. 2018).”
- Constraints on the neutron star equation of state from AT2017gfo using radiative transfer simulations (2018, methodology): “We restrict our analysis to spherical symmetry and a uniform composition, and neglect mixing of different ejecta types (Rosswog et al. 2017b) when we add the two separate model components.”