The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation.: Empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany

By D. Kammerer. 2009

408 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8064cb222a50ac68ddc2b16b1f594b2615c4fe32

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Environmental Innovations, Local Networks and Internationalization (2012, background): “6 Germany is a leading exponent of this strategy in terms of its economic system and approach to regulation (Kammerer, 2009; Rehfeld et al., 2007; F rondel et al., 2006).”
Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: a systematic literature review (2014, background): “Also Pujari et al. (2003), Jabbour (2008) and Kammerer (2009) verified the subjacent dimensions behind environmentally sustainable innovation practices, as well as the relative influence of management variables, processes and their interfaces on innovation performance.”
Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance (2012, background): “Many authors identify environmental regulation as the most important driver of eco-innovation as it can change the level and nature of competition between firms (Porter and van der Linde, 1995; Kammerer, 2009).”
Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany (2018, background): “Finally, we include a firm's experience with using green technologies to capture accumulated resources as well as technological and organizational capabilities and competencies in using the respective green technology as drivers of innovation (Horbach et al., 2012; Kammerer, 2009).2”
Residential Energy-Efficient Technology Adoption, Energy Conservation, Knowledge, and Attitudes: An Analysis of European Countries (2012, background): “Kammerer (2009) emphasizes the importance of additional customer benefits as a key factor in the demand for “green” products.”
Eco-innovation, sustainable supply chains and environmental performance in European industries (2017, neutral): “…between the influence of public intervention and regulation, market-driven demand and internal strategies driven by environmental management systems (Carrión-Flores et al., 2013; Fischer and Newell, 2008; Kammerer, 2009; Popp, 2006, 2010; Rehfeld et al., 2007; Reinhardt, 1998; Wagner, 2007).”
Determinants of Eco-innovations by Type of Environmental Impact: The Role of Regulatory Push/Pull, Technology Push and Market Pull (2012, background): “Secondly, Kammerer (2009) contributes to the discussion of market pull factors as determinants of environmental innovations by introducing the concept of customer benefits which is”
Lock-in and path dependence: an evolutionary approach to eco-innovations (2014, background): “This success was backed by the evolution of consumers’ perceptions, as they eventually acknowledged the environmental benefits deriving from the adoption of these eco-innovations (Kammerer 2009).”
Drivers and barriers of eco-innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective (2018, positive): “In contrast, fewer research efforts have been devoted to 1These variables include the adoption of an environmental management system (Horbach et al., 2012; Kesidou & Demirel, 2012; Rave et al., 2011), ownership of an approved ISO14001 or EMAS certification (Mazzanti & Zoboli, 2006), relevant changes”
A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology (2018, background): “Noci and Verganti (1999); Rennings (2000); Kammerer (2009); De Marchi (2012); Tariq et al. (2017); Zhu et al. (2018) Responding to stakeholders pressure for green and sustainable products (SC4) Response to pressure created from various stakeholders such as customers, employees, shareholders,…”