Instruments and methods in outdoor thermal comfort studies – The need for standardization

By E. Johansson, S. Thorsson, R. Emmanuel, E. Krüger. 2014

441 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Environmental Engineering, Speech and Hearing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8061c0bd85bfc3e2142275c744480059a882222c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. Neveen Hamza
2. M. Elnabawi

In Environmental Engineering

1. Wei David Liu
2. Qingyan Chen
3. Neveen Hamza
4. M. Elnabawi
5. Thijs Defraeye

In Speech and Hearing

1. Neveen Hamza
2. M. Elnabawi

Citations in the corpus

• Behavioural Perspectives of Outdoor Thermal Comfort in Urban Areas: A Critical Review (2019, methodology): “• The interval time between the measurements should be sufficient to cover both low and high speeds, at least in locations where high wind speeds are expected; • Hot-wire and hot-sphere anemometers can measure low wind speeds but still have some limitations for high-speed wind, in addition to omni-d”
• A comprehensive review of thermal comfort studies in urban open spaces. (2020, methodology): “The conflict may be due to the different methods used to obtain (Johansson et al., 2014), analyze, and interpret the data.”