A simple unified theory for flow in the canopy and roughness sublayer

By I. Harman, J. Finnigan. 2007

337 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/805679bd2f3f6a470dc27ad953bd684591f9c58f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. Charles Meneveau
2. J. Sadique
3. Rajat Mittal
4. Xiang I. A. Yang
5. E. Patton
6. J. Finnigan
7. Fernando Port'e-Agel
8. Rob Stoll

In Environmental Engineering

1. Xiang I. A. Yang
2. J. Sadique
3. Rajat Mittal
4. E. Patton
5. R. Shaw
6. Charles Meneveau
7. J. Finnigan
8. Fernando Port'e-Agel

In Global and Planetary Change

1. R. Shaw
2. E. Patton
3. Charles Meneveau
4. Xiang I. A. Yang
5. J. Sadique
6. Rajat Mittal
7. J. Finnigan
8. Gabriel G. Katul

Citations in the corpus

• Exponential roughness layer and analytical model for turbulent boundary layer flow over rectangular-prism roughness elements (2016, methodology): “Moreover, although differential urban canopy models can make more detailed predictions than morphometric models, being differential instead of algebraic (e.g. Coceal & Belcher 2004; Harman & Finnigan 2007), they are more costly to evaluate.”
• Turbulence structure above a vegetation canopy (2009, background): “…typically use MOST formulae as their lower boundary condition, and over tall roughness elements, the lowest resolved grid points lie within the RSL so that departures from MOST have implications for predictions throughout the boundary layer (Physick & Garratt 1995; Harman & Finnigan 2007, 2008).”