Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa.

By K. Dunkle, R. Jewkes, H. Brown, G. Gray, J. McIntryre, S. Harlow. The Lancet, 2004

1,433 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Sexuality and relationships education: toward a social studies approach (2005, background): “some settings under such rubrics as Civics, Religion, Society, and Ethics ( Csank, 2005; Lkhagvasuren, 2005; Marques, 2005; Rajani 2005; RamaRao, 2005).”
Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Is Women Empowerment a Reducing Factor? A Study from a National Bangladeshi Sample (2011, background): “IPV has been shown to adversely affect women’s health, with evidence of an increased risk of HIV/AIDS, peri-natal and neonatal mortality, and a range of reproductive, mental and physical outcomes (Dunkle et al. 2004; Jejeebhoy 1998; Patel et al. 2006; Sidibe et al. 2006; Silverman et al. 2008; Steph”
Understanding Women's Risk for HIV Infection Using Social Dominance Theory and the Four Bases of Gendered Power (2010, background): “Further, in a study of 1,366 women in Soweto, South Africa—even after controlling for age, for current relationship status, and for women’s own risk behavior—partner violence and women’s own feelings of being controlled in their relationships significantly predicted their actual HIV status (Dunkle e”
What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence (2011, background): “In addition to being a concern in its own right, IPV is associated with a range of adverse physical, mental, sexual and reproductive health outcomes [2-8].”