Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology

By S. Lilienfeld, S. Lynn, J. Lohr. 2003

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7fedb8a78befc71a674067ea2fd83b07b548a867

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Daniel O. David
2. J. Joseph
3. G. Montgomery

Citations in the corpus

• The Scientific Status of Psychotherapies: A New Evaluative Framework for Evidence‐Based Psychosocial Interventions (2011, background): “The term pseudoscience cannot be rigorously categorically defined; a prototypic definition, based on a number of themes, is used instead (see Lilienfeld et al., 2003).”
• Genetic Research in Psychiatry and Psychology (2010, background): “Lilienfeld et al. (2003) addressed this ‘‘holism’’ argument, pointing out that pseudoscience proponents ‘‘typically maintain that scientific claims can be evaluated only within the context of broader claims and therefore cannot be judged in isolation’’ (p. 9).”