A Survey of Sparse Representation: Algorithms and Applications

By Zheng Zhang, Yong Xu, Jian Yang, Xuelong Li, David Dapeng Zhang. IEEE Access, 2015

1,061 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Sparse representation has attracted much attention from researchers in fields of signal processing, image processing, computer vision, and pattern recognition. Sparse representation also has a good reputation in both theoretical research and practical applications. Many different algorithms have been proposed for sparse representation. The main purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive study and an updated review on sparse representation and to supply guidance for researchers. The taxonomy of sparse representation methods can be studied from various viewpoints. For example, in terms of different norm minimizations used in sparsity constraints, the methods can be roughly categorized into five groups: 1) sparse representation with l0-norm minimization; 2) sparse representation with lp-norm (0 <; p <; 1) minimization; 3) sparse representation with l1-norm minimization; 4) sparse representation with l2,1-norm minimization; and 5) sparse representation with l2-norm minimization. In this paper, a comprehensive overview of sparse representation is provided. The available sparse representation algorithms can also be empirically categorized into four groups: 1) greedy strategy approximation; 2) constrained optimization; 3) proximity algorithm-based optimization; and 4) homotopy algorithm-based sparse representation. The rationales of different algorithms in each category are analyzed and a wide range of sparse representation applications are summarized, which could sufficiently reveal the potential nature of the sparse representation theory. In particular, an experimentally comparative study of these sparse representation algorithms was presented.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7fda3b7e173936bc8acbafc7f2963c10675939d8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Dacheng Tao
  2. Tien-Ping Tan
  3. Jie Gui
  4. Zhiqiang Ge
  5. Shuiwang Ji
  6. Zhenan Sun
  7. Qingqiang Sun
  8. Jieping Ye

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Dacheng Tao
  2. Zhenan Sun
  3. Tien-Ping Tan
  4. Jie Gui
  5. Luc Van Gool
  6. Shuiwang Ji
  7. Xiaogang Wang
  8. Zhiqiang Ge

Citations in the corpus